Facebook's Australian News Ban: A Major Miscalculation
Written on
Chapter 1: The Unexpected Ban
On February 18, 2021, Australians awoke to a shocking reality: news content had vanished from Facebook. This included not only links to local news but also international media sources. With around 13 million users affected, the ban meant that not only was news content inaccessible, but previously shared posts from various news outlets were also erased.
In a classic display of Facebook's approach, this sweeping ban inadvertently impacted numerous charities, sports organizations, community groups, and even governmental health services that rely on the platform. Ironically, Facebook's own page was rendered empty.
This drastic measure stemmed from the Australian government passing the News Media Bargaining Code, a law aimed at mandating payments from major digital platforms like Facebook and Google to Australian media outlets for the news shared on their platforms. Just five days after the ban, Facebook reversed its decision following negotiations with the government, which included minor amendments to the law.
Section 1.1: The Law Behind the Ban
The origins of this law trace back to 2017, when an inquiry was launched to assess the impact of digital platforms on competition within media and advertising markets. The findings of a 2019 report by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) revealed that Google and Facebook were cornering the advertising market, taking a combined 81% of ad revenue in Australia.
With Google capturing a monthly audience of 20 million Australians and Facebook reaching 18 million, they became essential partners for news publishers. The ACCC report highlighted a troubling decline in the output of Australian journalism, crucial for a healthy democracy, while noting that media outlets were not receiving advertising revenue from the content shared by these platforms.
Section 1.2: The Reaction from Tech Giants
Both Google and Facebook argued that Australian media benefited from traffic directed to their sites. However, Dan Stinton, managing director of Guardian Australia, refuted this, claiming that these companies controlled the online landscape for most Australians.
Following discussions with stakeholders, the ACCC proposed the News Media Bargaining Code, aimed at creating a fair negotiation framework between digital platforms and news organizations. Google’s reaction was to attempt to dismantle the bargaining code, resorting to warnings and public threats, including the possibility of shutting down its search engine in Australia.
Chapter 2: Pushback from Australia
The first video discusses how Facebook's news ban affected Australian users and media organizations, revealing the broader implications of such a move.
Shortly after, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison firmly stated that Australia sets its own regulations, rejecting Google's intimidation tactics. Meanwhile, Microsoft offered its Bing search engine as an alternative to Google, promising compliance with the new law.
The second video covers the ongoing conflict between Australia and tech giants like Facebook and Google, exploring the nuances of the dispute and its implications for digital regulation.
In the wake of Facebook's ban, Morrison's actions garnered global attention, leading to widespread media coverage. Following back-and-forth discussions, Facebook ultimately agreed to pay Australian publishers for news content, signaling a significant shift in the relationship between tech platforms and media companies.
The fallout from Facebook's decision highlighted not just a corporate blunder but also a potential turning point in how digital giants interact with governmental regulations. As Stephen Scheeler noted, this incident could inspire a global reevaluation of Big Tech's influence and accountability.