New Global ESG Regulatory Frameworks: An Overview of Recent Developments
Written on
Chapter 1: Recent Global ESG Regulations
Across the globe, national and international political bodies are introducing updated regulations to ensure that local governments, corporations, and investment funds are held accountable for their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) objectives. Notable organizations that have released recent ESG guidelines include the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States, the European Union's 'Fit for 55' initiative, and Ping An's 'Guidance for Enterprise ESG Disclosure' in China.
Local regulatory agencies such as the Australian Sustainable Finance Institution (ASFI) and Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) are also working towards establishing measurable frameworks to evaluate organizations' success in achieving their ESG goals. This movement has gained momentum thanks to the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), which is advocating for the development of unified rules for disclosing climate risks and other ESG-related issues.
The video titled "ESG: Regulatory and Political Considerations for U.S. and Global Asset Managers" delves into the landscape of ESG regulations and their implications for asset managers. It addresses the regulatory pressures and political factors influencing ESG practices in the U.S. and globally.
Section 1.1: The Need for Clear Disclosure Standards
In March 2022, the ISSB proposed frameworks to guide regulators on how organizations should disclose their ESG measures. The ISSB envisions its proposals as a template for other regulatory bodies to establish a "global baseline" for ESG disclosure standards. The absence of robust disclosure standards underscores the necessity for formal guidelines, as many existing frameworks have proven inadequate.
Governments are establishing social and environmental targets, and it is evident that holding businesses accountable for their operational impacts is crucial for achieving these objectives. As a result, the emphasis on clear disclosure standards is paramount, ensuring organizations can consistently report their social and environmental effects.
Subsection 1.1.1: SEC's New ESG Guidelines
The SEC's recent amendments aim to ensure that entities disclosing ESG-related information do so in a transparent and standardized manner. In the United States, the SEC has revised its rules for investment entities, mandating "consistent standards for ESG disclosures" to help investors make informed decisions. Additionally, these amendments seek to eliminate the practice of greenwashing, where firms misrepresent their ESG commitments.
The SEC articulates that its regulations will enable investors to assess whether a fund's ESG marketing claims are supported by actual measures taken to meet ESG objectives. Furthermore, the SEC now requires funds focused on environmental issues to disclose their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, although a clause allows some firms to evade this requirement.
Section 1.2: EU's Comprehensive ESG Initiatives
The European Union has similarly introduced legislative proposals and policy initiatives aimed at achieving a 55% reduction in net GHG emissions by 2030. The "Fit for 55" package covers a broad range of topics designed to influence both corporate behavior and consumer habits. These initiatives focus on increasing investments in renewable energy sources, enhancing energy efficiency, and exploring alternatives to fossil fuels in sectors like aviation and shipping.
The proposals also include a social climate fund to support the decarbonization of heating and cooling systems in buildings and to improve access to low-emission transportation options. One significant measure is the "carbon border adjustment mechanism," which seeks to prevent emissions reductions within the EU from being undermined by increased emissions from non-EU countries.
Chapter 2: Climate Risk Disclosures in Japan and Australia
The video "ESG Talk + Off the Books: Making Sense of the SEC Rule on Climate-Related Disclosures" provides insights into the SEC's climate-related disclosure rules and their implications for businesses.
Japan's FSA is working to mandate climate risk disclosures for companies, with plans potentially becoming effective for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2022. The FSA aims to increase scrutiny on funds claiming environmental benefits and combat greenwashing.
Similarly, Australia and Singapore have their own Sustainable Finance Initiatives (ASFI) aimed at leveraging the financial sector to create low-carbon economies. The Australian SFI, established in 2019, seeks to align with international efforts, including those from the EU, while adapting regulations to fit the Australian economic context.
National and international legislative bodies are actively updating guidelines on ESG practices at both organizational and individual levels. Some, like the EU, have already articulated clear goals and actions, while others, such as the Australian SFI, are still in the planning phase.
The collective focus on establishing rigorous systems for climate and social risk disclosures indicates a serious commitment to addressing greenwashing and enhancing transparency in reporting practices. As the threats to our global climate and ecosystems persist, the push for clear standards will be crucial in fostering accountability and promoting sustainable practices in various industries.