# Will ChatGPT Outshine Google as the Future of Search?
Written on
Chapter 1: The Rise of ChatGPT
Since the debut of ChatGPT, there has been considerable speculation regarding the fate of search engines, with some declaring that "Google will vanish" as ChatGPT rises to prominence. Reports indicate that Google has issued a "code red" response due to the significant attention ChatGPT has garnered.
However, the situation is more nuanced than merely assessing effectiveness. Every system requires a business model for revenue generation, and it remains uncertain how an AI assistant will achieve this. Furthermore, we must address the critical role of user-generated content across the internet, which serves as the foundation for both search engines and AI.
Section 1.1: Understanding Google’s Position
Let’s start by clarifying a common misconception: Google is not lagging behind OpenAI (the creators of ChatGPT) in AI development. In fact, for nearly every model developed by OpenAI, Google has a comparable version. For example:
- Text-to-image: OpenAI's DALL·E 2 vs. Google's Imagen
- Conversational AI: OpenAI's ChatGPT vs. Google's LaMDA
- Text-to-code: OpenAI's Codex vs. Google's AlphaCode
Moreover, Google pioneered the current natural language processing revolution with the introduction of the transformer architecture in 2017.
Despite this, the two organizations have taken distinct approaches in rolling out their models. OpenAI has teamed up with Microsoft, launching APIs and applications like GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT. Google, conversely, has adopted a more cautious stance, offering fewer opportunities for user testing.
While one might argue that Google's strategy has been a misstep, it can also be contended that OpenAI and Microsoft have acted hastily. Many of these models exhibit flaws, including risks of misinformation and bias. Additionally, GitHub Copilot is currently embroiled in a lawsuit regarding the copyright of its training data.
Section 1.2: A Look at You.com
For a glimpse into a potential future for Google, consider You.com, a relatively new search engine launched in late 2021 that emphasizes privacy and AI. This platform allows users to receive summaries, code snippets, and widgets directly on the search page.
Recently, You.com introduced a feature called youChat, which provides a conversational interface akin to ChatGPT following each search query. Notably, it includes citations when referencing content from external websites.
In addition to these features, the platform offers text and code completion as well as image generation capabilities. While functional, these advancements still grapple with issues common to other AI applications, such as the potential for inaccuracies. The site explicitly states that:
"This product is in beta, and its accuracy may be limited. You.com is not liable for generated content."
Smaller organizations can afford to take risks more readily than larger ones like Google, which caters to billions of users. Implementing a model that incurs substantial costs and could disseminate misinformation is a considerable gamble.
Chapter 2: The Business Model Challenge
It’s essential to recognize that ChatGPT may not remain free indefinitely, leaving its future availability uncertain. Google’s revenue is primarily driven by advertising through its search engine. A shift toward a conversational AI assistant could undermine this model, as users typically prefer links to websites rather than direct answers.
Section 2.1: The Data Dilemma
Another significant factor to consider is data ownership. Google and similar search engines do not own the content they link to; they act as intermediaries between users and the vast array of websites online.
A pressing concern for search engines adopting more AI is the extent to which they utilize third-party content. Each search query involves two components: the algorithm that identifies relevant content and the actual content itself. By employing AI to provide answers or detailed summaries, search engines risk appropriating part of the content landscape, reducing the necessity to direct users elsewhere.
One might argue that such a shift would streamline the search process. However, this reasoning overlooks a critical flaw: search engines, regardless of AI advancements, will continue to depend on content. AI systems require ongoing updates and learning from human-generated information. If the profitability of content creation declines, we may witness several outcomes:
- A decrease in content production (if fewer visitors result in lower profitability)
- An uptick in AI-generated content (due to reduced costs)
- More content placed behind paywalls (to avoid reliance on SEO)
- Websites blocking Google from scraping their content (if it offers no benefits)
It’s important to note that these concerns primarily affect sites focused solely on information. For example, an online store would not experience the same impact from AI advancements.
Section 2.2: The Search Engine versus Social Media
Search engines and AI primarily serve the purpose of answering questions rather than discovering new content. For example, when using Twitter, users often seek entertainment or the latest news rather than specific information. This also applies to platforms like Medium.
A useful analogy is to think of a search engine as a library, while Twitter, Medium, and similar platforms function more like magazines.
Conclusion: The Future Landscape
Will ChatGPT replace Google? It seems unlikely. Currently, there are no clear business models for AI assistants, and it is probable that ChatGPT will soon transition to a paid model. Additionally, these AI tools typically provide singular responses to inquiries, suggesting they will need to be complemented by other sources.
Another challenge lies in the necessity for these AI assistants to continuously access content created by others. The legal implications of this relationship remain uncertain, but establishing a mutually beneficial arrangement with content creators will be essential.
Nevertheless, if a viable business model for AI is developed and demand grows, Google may well integrate similar technologies into its search engine, given its leadership position in AI advancements.