Exploring the Intersection of Philosophy and Science: A Deep Dive
Written on
Understanding Philosophy and Science
In 2010, Stephen Hawking provocatively claimed that “philosophy is dead,” echoing Nietzsche's famous line about God. He argued that philosophers have not kept pace with advancements in science, particularly in physics. Hawking suggested that while most people do not dwell on philosophical inquiries, they inevitably ponder existential questions: Why are we here? Where do we come from? Traditionally, these have been philosophical inquiries, yet he maintained that philosophy had become obsolete.
However, this perspective is flawed. The question “Where do we come from?” has always been theological rather than philosophical. On the other hand, the inquiry into “Why are we here?” cannot be fully addressed by science unless it rephrases the previous question. If it's not merely about origins, then philosophy is well-equipped to tackle this issue or to assert that no definitive answer exists. So, why would one declare philosophy dead?
If we consider “Why are we here?” as a matter of purpose, then science falls short of providing an answer. This leaves philosophy as the sole domain capable of addressing such questions. To think that science could provide a concrete answer is to mistakenly assume that empirical evidence can resolve matters of purpose. Hawking likely viewed the notion of teleological questions as absurd from an empirical standpoint. Yet, arguing against teleology using empirical reasoning is, in itself, a philosophical stance. Existentialist thought has addressed the question of existence in ways reminiscent of Hawking’s proposed answers over a century ago.
Science, in its purest form, does not deliver insights into values. It might elucidate how the world operates or what it consists of empirically, but it does not dictate how things ought to be. It reveals only the current state of affairs or potential states, based on empirical observations.
Philosophy's Role Beyond Empiricism
Philosophy aids in uncovering the fundamental nature of things, extending beyond empirical understanding. It is clear that science cannot engage with core issues related to epistemology, ontology, and logic. If you identify as an empiricist and wish to deny philosophy's ability to address fundamental epistemological questions, you can only do so through philosophical reasoning—not scientific claims.
Hawking’s misunderstanding reflects a broader misapprehension, not just affecting him but also contemporary philosophy as a whole. Philosophy and science serve fundamentally different roles; one generates a body of knowledge, while the other does not produce knowledge in the same manner. Instead, philosophy often draws upon ideas from various fields as a framework for inquiry rather than a direct source of answers.
The Dichotomy of Knowledge and Practice
Science is typically understood in two ways: as a methodology and as a body of knowledge. The scientific method, while not as straightforward as textbooks suggest, is nonetheless a process for developing and testing hypotheses that yield empirical solutions to tangible problems. The resultant knowledge represents a collection of facts and theories that enhance our understanding of the world. If we disregard this body of knowledge, we at least recognize its close ties to the scientific method. While scientific theories are subject to revision, a certain continuity exists in the evolution of knowledge.
This leads to confusion when we compare philosophy to science, mistakenly expecting philosophy to possess a comparable body of knowledge. However, I contend that philosophy has never held such a body of knowledge; it is primarily a practice, distinct from science’s methodological and knowledge-based approaches.
Practices aim to achieve specific goals without necessarily adhering to a strict formula. Golf and art, for example, are practices that can be methodical but do not have to be. In contrast, the philosophical practice is detached from any singular body of knowledge. Historically, philosophy has intertwined with various disciplines—religion, literature, mathematics, and significantly, science.
Most analytic philosophers lean heavily on these fields, referencing contemporary scientific thought and earlier philosophical works. Yet, it is crucial to understand that the invocation of science does not imply it surpasses philosophy; rather, both have coexisted since the early days of philosophical inquiry, such as with the Pre-Socratics.
Philosophy and the History of Ideas
The only commonly associated body of knowledge with philosophy is the history of ideas, which is distinct from philosophy itself. While thinkers like Kant and Plato may inform contemporary philosophical discussions, their insights belong to the study of historical thought rather than philosophy per se. Similarly, the evolution of Newtonian physics represents the history of science rather than a philosophical dialogue.
This distinction elucidates why philosophy cannot claim a definitive body of knowledge. Academic disciplines often begin with philosophical questions, yet once they develop concrete answers, those insights transcend philosophy and establish new fields of study. Science, once inseparable from philosophy, distinguished itself as it began to formulate systematic answers beyond philosophical discourse.
In contrast, the inquiries philosophy raises often lack definitive resolutions. When philosophy discovers a compelling answer, it typically leads to a new assumption that forms the basis of a new discipline, evolving beyond its original scope.
The Pursuit of Understanding
Engaging with philosophy is not about finding satisfying answers; it is about seeking understanding that transcends mere knowledge. This understanding does not have to be rooted in factuality; it is about grasping the broader framework of knowledge, value, and purpose and how we can navigate these concepts in our lives and the larger ecosystem we inhabit.
Thus, while this form of knowledge may seem intangible, it emphasizes the essence of philosophy as a pursuit of wisdom. It involves contemplating aspects of existence that may remain elusive, but embracing the journey is what ultimately renders the practice meaningful.
A deep dive into epistemology, exploring how knowledge can vary and the philosophical implications of understanding.
An introductory overview of epistemology, shedding light on the theory of knowledge and its significance in philosophical discourse.